Some authors have criticized the focus on dangers within the ethics of technology. One strand of criticism argues that we often lack the knowledge to reliably assess the risks of a new technology before it has come into use. We usually have no idea the probability that something would possibly go incorrect, and sometimes we even do not know, or a minimal of not fully, what might go mistaken and what possible adverse consequences may be. Another strand of criticism states that the concentrate on risks has led to a reduction of the impacts of technology that are considered (Swierstra & te Molder 2012). Only impacts associated to safety and well being, which may be calculated as dangers, are thought-about, whereas ‘soft’ impacts, for instance of a social or psychological nature, are uncared for, thereby impoverishing the moral evaluation of latest technologies.
- Public views are tied to how these applied
